PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Revenue growth of 1.49% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.48%
Gross profit growth of 1.48% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.13%
EBIT growth below 50% of SAND's 46.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.13%
Operating income growth under 50% of SAND's 46.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 82.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 94.79%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 94.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.21%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 229.60%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while SAND is at 229.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.47%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
180.75%
10Y CAGR of 180.75% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
89.12%
5Y CAGR of 89.12% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
92.51%
3Y CAGR of 92.51% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 91.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 91.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 94.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 94.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 146.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 146.63%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 45.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.40%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
27.56%
Debt growth of 27.56% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.