PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth of 0.28% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-82.43%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-95.52%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 84.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.52%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 84.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-362.24%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 86.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 86.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-325.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 86.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
16.15%
Share change of 16.15% while SAND is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.54%
Diluted share change of 9.54% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
10Y CAGR of 80.95% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
3Y CAGR of 44.83% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
89.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 8.36%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 8.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
Our AR growth while SAND is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Positive asset growth while SAND is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-9.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.91%
Debt growth of 5.91% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.