PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.20%
Revenue growth of 10.20% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-7.24%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
46.83%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.83%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.02%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 1979.01%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.67%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 449.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 515.18%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
10.44%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 544.52%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.42%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 1921.93%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
27.48%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y CAGR of 75.71% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
936.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 188.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-41.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 188.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 423.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-46.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 423.84%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2332.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 813.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.11%
Below 50% of SAND's 813.95%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
220.52%
AR growth well above SAND's 28.15%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.22%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 3525.49%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.70%
Under 50% of SAND's 718.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.54%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 43.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.