PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Revenue growth of 68.51% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
62.95%
Gross profit growth of 62.95% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
82.56%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
82.56%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.05%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
57.14%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
83.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 31.06%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
5.38%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 33.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-769.02%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 84.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
201.56%
10Y CAGR of 201.56% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
3Y CAGR of 17.40% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
12.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 103.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4.77%
Below 50% of SAND's 103.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 285.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SAND is at 285.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
Below 50% of SAND's 285.78%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
Our AR growth while SAND is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.84%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
19.91%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
88.69%
Debt growth of 88.69% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 276.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.