PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.55%
Revenue growth of 10.55% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
42.29%
Gross profit growth of 42.29% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
31.40%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SAND's 54.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
31.40%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SAND's 54.45%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
19.33%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 39.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-73.33%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 42.66%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 42.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.16%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 4.71%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while SAND is at 4.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.30%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 51.28%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
17.36%
FCF growth under 50% of SAND's 93.28%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
78.28%
10Y CAGR of 78.28% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
140.24%
5Y CAGR of 140.24% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
48.10%
3Y CAGR of 48.10% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 90.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
55.50%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 90.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 69.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
50.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of SAND's 69.60%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
440.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 666.00%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
60.50%
Below 50% of SAND's 666.00%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.50%
AR growth well above SAND's 23.54%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.22%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.83%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-75.82%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.