PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Positive revenue growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
25.66%
Positive gross profit growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.79%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.79%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.19%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.55%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 5.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
32.30%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.01%
FCF growth under 50% of SAND's 75.55%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
145787334.37%
10Y CAGR of 145787334.37% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
152.10%
5Y CAGR of 152.10% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
148.31%
3Y CAGR of 148.31% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
47649.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 77.94%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 77.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
197.01%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
55639.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
261.20%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
302.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
Below 50% of SAND's 940.62%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
92.18%
Below 50% of SAND's 321.94%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SAND's 1672.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SAND's 3.00%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.14%
75-90% of SAND's 2.51%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-7.14%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 137.73%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.