PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.89%
Revenue growth under 50% of SAND's 11.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-3.63%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 8.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.14%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.14%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.92%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 19.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.76%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.12%
Reduced diluted shares while SAND is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.56%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 21.52%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.81%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
513.84%
10Y CAGR of 513.84% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
204.35%
5Y CAGR of 204.35% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
309.78%
3Y CAGR of 309.78% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
4244.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 295.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
289.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to SAND's 295.98%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
450.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 121.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13671.58%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 384.16% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
287.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 384.16%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
546.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2996.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 1127.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
139.38%
Below 50% of SAND's 1127.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
83.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.66%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 6127.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 6.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.90%
75-90% of SAND's 3.41%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-9.99%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 19.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.