PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 8.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of SAND's 245.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of SAND's 245.68%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 108.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 109.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 107.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-109.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
436.30%
10Y CAGR of 436.30% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
232.88%
5Y CAGR of 232.88% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
3.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 157.45%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 536.04%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 373.87%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-10.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 168.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 227.80% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 228.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-35.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 144.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 145.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
Below 50% of SAND's 1557.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 82.29%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SAND invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 102.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 5.42%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
75-90% of SAND's 2.33%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.