PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.80%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-278.54%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 59.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-284.62%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 57.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-284.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 57.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share count expansion well above SAND's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.06%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-51.94%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-8.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8.51%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
250.27%
10Y CAGR of 250.27% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
40.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 1421.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
417.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 2073.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
20.23%
Below 50% of SAND's 3272.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-32.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-721.54%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-217.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-170.14%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
934.73%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 806.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
86.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 116.46%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
27.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.03%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SAND invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-16.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.51%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.