PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Positive revenue growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while SAND is at 15.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while SAND is at 15.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Dividend growth of 6.53% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y CAGR of 425.17% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
17.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 29.90%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 5093.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-53.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 1034.82%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
60.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 8.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SAND invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.44%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SAND's 21.73%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
Debt growth of 126.58% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.