PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of SAND's 17.37%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
29.46%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
37.40%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.40%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.16%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.00%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above SAND's 1.31%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 2.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.51%
FCF growth 50-75% of SAND's 27.08%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
122.35%
10Y CAGR of 122.35% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-11.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SAND stands at 4603.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
3.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 177.67%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-35.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is at 452.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-12.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
19.00%
Below 50% of SAND's 239.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-67.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is 145.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 120.88%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
Below 50% of SAND's 1517.90%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
59.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SAND's 55.47%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.39% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-67.63%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SAND invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
156.53%
AR growth well above SAND's 6.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.