PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 14.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.86%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 24.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.52%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 27.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.52%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 27.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
463.45%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 36752.63%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
460.00%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 50100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 40100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-31.36%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 18.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
124.38%
10Y CAGR of 124.38% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-20.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-3.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 602.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-41.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-15.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 15.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
22.82%
Below 50% of SAND's 259.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-66.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-37.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 24.53%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
256.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 130.86%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
44.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SAND's 46.74%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
AR growth well above SAND's 14.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.73%
Under 50% of SAND's 2.96%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.81%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 47.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.