PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.72%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-35.05%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.05%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 218.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 177.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 194.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.08%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-47.61%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
16.12%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.47%
10Y CAGR of 163.47% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-10.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
10.49%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
171.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 396.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-26.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-0.73%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-6.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is at 118.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-64.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is 170.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to SAND's 124.69%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
222.43%
Below 50% of SAND's 832.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
25.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
86.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.39% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-84.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 21.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while SAND is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.33%
Debt growth of 44.33% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.