PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth similar to SAND's 19.94%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
42.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 86.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 109.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 109.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Net income growth comparable to SAND's 152.67%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
160.71%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SAND's 200.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
160.71%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of SAND's 200.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.23%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.56%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
30.24%
OCF growth above 1.5x SAND's 12.36%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
10Y CAGR of 124.83% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 10.07%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND stands at 30.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 218.65%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-5.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 17.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
58.76%
Below 50% of SAND's 3040.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 96.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SAND's 116.85%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
15.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.92% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.54% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
156.25%
AR growth well above SAND's 62.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 1.29%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.52%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.47%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 26.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 1.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.