PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 4.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 53.35%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 17.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SAND's 243.04%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
194.74%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SAND's 300.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SAND's 292.16%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.97%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 30.36%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 37.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 406.73%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to SAND's 159.31%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
60.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.