PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth of 11.63% vs. zero growth in Gold. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
9.27%
Gross profit growth of 9.27% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
9.27%
EBIT growth of 9.27% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
9.27%
Operating income growth of 9.27% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.20%
Share growth above Gold median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.19%
Diluted share growth above 2x Gold median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-60.06%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
17.39%
OCF growth 75-90% of Gold median of 20.25%. John Neff would push for improvements in working capital or margins.
8.48%
FCF growth near Gold median of 8.48%. Charlie Munger could consider this standard for the industry’s capex cycle.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y CAGR of 107.92% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-11.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
154.13%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 26.75% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 16.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-29.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
118.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 13.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 2.31%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-96.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-65.69%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 91.18% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 40.25% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.67% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-64.69%
AR shrinking while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Gold is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.13%
We expand assets while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
2.66%
Positive BV/share change while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.