PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Negative revenue growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-37.06%
Negative gross profit growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-31.50%
Negative EBIT growth while Gold median is 1.21%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-31.50%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
31.79%
Net income growth of 31.79% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
30.30%
EPS growth of 30.30% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.30% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.05%
Share growth above Gold median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a meaningful advantage if shares are undervalued.
-52.12%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while Gold median is 22.28%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-43.96%
Negative FCF growth while Gold median is 16.78%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
6.31%
10Y CAGR of 6.31% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
5.48%
5Y CAGR of 5.48% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-3.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-5.92%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 2.62%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
17.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 17.09% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
7.38%
3Y OCF/share growth of 7.38% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
28.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 19.02% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
188.77%
Net income/share CAGR of 188.77% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
155.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 155.80% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
72.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.43% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
26.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 26.47% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
24.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.20% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
49.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.75% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
70.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 70.16% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-31.31%
AR shrinking while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.56%
Decreasing inventory while Gold is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.15%
We expand assets while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
2.00%
Positive BV/share change while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-11.95%
Debt is shrinking while Gold median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.