95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.04%
Negative gross profit growth while Gold median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while Gold median is 26.95%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 24.52%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is 30.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while Gold median is 32.79%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Gold median is 32.79%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.07%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a meaningful advantage if shares are undervalued.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while Gold median is 4.60%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while Gold median is 13.84%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
5.34%
5Y CAGR of 5.34% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 14.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
5.49%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 1.78%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Gold median of 38.78%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
60.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
16.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 16.20% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
65.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.46% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 35.36% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 4.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
AR shrinking while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-37.75%
Decreasing inventory while Gold is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.15%
We expand assets while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
1.34%
Positive BV/share change while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-10.20%
Debt is shrinking while Gold median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
Our SG&A slightly up while Gold is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.