PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.79%
Negative revenue growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.44%
Negative gross profit growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-17.01%
Negative EBIT growth while Gold median is 2.93%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-17.01%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 2.93%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is -2.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-21.88%
Negative EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-21.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.02%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while Gold median is 0.36%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-50.24%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-15.45%
Negative OCF growth while Gold median is 26.85%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-32.66%
Negative FCF growth while Gold median is 25.91%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
5.30%
10Y CAGR of 5.30% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
17.64%
5Y CAGR of 17.64% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-28.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
13.22%
OCF/share CAGR below 50% of Gold median. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash flow over the long term.
54.57%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 32.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-25.62%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
18.59%
Below 50% of Gold median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
235.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 38.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-23.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is -31.13%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
61.85%
Positive 10Y equity/share growth while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a significant edge in building book value vs. struggling peers.
29.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 29.21% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
22.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
46.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.20% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
91.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 91.79% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
76.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.29% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
57.36%
AR growth of 57.36% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-50.99%
Decreasing inventory while Gold is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.02%
Below 50% of Gold median. Jim Chanos suspects stagnation or limited capital availability for expansions.
-0.06%
Negative BV/share change while Gold median is -0.87%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.44%
Debt is shrinking while Gold median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.