PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.79%
Negative revenue growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.44%
Negative gross profit growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-17.01%
Negative EBIT growth while Basic Materials median is 5.68%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-17.01%
Negative operating income growth while Basic Materials median is 7.32%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while Basic Materials median is 2.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-21.88%
Negative EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 2.95%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-21.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.02%
Share growth above Basic Materials median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-50.24%
Dividend cuts while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-15.45%
Negative OCF growth while Basic Materials median is 6.80%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-32.66%
Negative FCF growth while Basic Materials median is 9.51%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
5.30%
10Y CAGR of 5.30% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
17.64%
5Y CAGR of 17.64% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-28.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
13.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 13.22% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
54.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 54.57% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-25.62%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
18.59%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Basic Materials median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
235.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 8.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-23.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
61.85%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 7.45% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
29.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 13.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
22.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 14.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
46.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.20% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
91.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 91.79% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
76.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.29% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
57.36%
AR growth of 57.36% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-50.99%
Decreasing inventory while Basic Materials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.02%
Asset growth of 0.02% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.06%
Negative BV/share change while Basic Materials median is -0.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.44%
Debt is shrinking while Basic Materials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.