95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth of 6.97% vs. zero growth in Basic Materials. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
10.64%
Gross profit growth of 10.64% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
13.90%
EBIT growth of 13.90% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
13.42%
Operating income growth of 13.42% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
15.07%
Net income growth of 15.07% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
14.29%
EPS growth of 14.29% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 14.29% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.04%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a meaningful advantage if shares are undervalued.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth of 15.01% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-74.72%
Negative FCF growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
172.48%
10Y CAGR of 172.48% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
100.60%
5Y CAGR of 100.60% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
65.26%
3Y CAGR of 65.26% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
238.06%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 30.49% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 47.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 52.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
384.37%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 52.59% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
173.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 35.73%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
95.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 41.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
53.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 53.97% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 40.97% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
19.77%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Basic Materials is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
282.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 282.43% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
76.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.17% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
25.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 25.66% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
147.04%
Slight AR growth while Basic Materials cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth of 3.14% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.43%
Positive BV/share change while Basic Materials median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
1.99%
Debt growth of 1.99% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.