95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.55%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AEM's 37.64%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.55%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 16.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
355.66%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.17%
Total costs growth less than half of AEM's 32.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 13.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
144.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 51.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.76%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 10.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 315.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.30%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 201.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-70.39%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 264.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 219.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
224.31%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.84%
Net income decline while AEM shows 229.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.19%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 194.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
EPS decline while AEM shows 205.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 221.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.