95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
84.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 43.89%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
42.40%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
113.04%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 66.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.53%
Similar margin change to AEM's 15.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.44%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 12.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
210.38%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
64.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.27%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 53.84%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
114.39%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of AEM's 180.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
15.32%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 95.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
101.43%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 216.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 120.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1003.33%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
103.40%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 23.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2831.71%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 83.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
82.56%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
71.43%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 7.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
16.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 8.49%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.