PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.51%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 69.39%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.37%
Cost growth less than half of AEM's 9.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 100.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.94%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 18.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-680.71%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 24.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-506.47%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 34.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-134.42%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 17.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
96.31%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 55.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
86.99%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.24%
Similar operating income growth to AEM's 155.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
108.82%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 51.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
258.57%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.39%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 31.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
109.92%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4162.76%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 134.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.52%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.97%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 1.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.