PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 24.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 18.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 27.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 2.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of AEM's 26.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 8.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.08%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 15.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
83.18%
Interest expense growth less than half of AEM's 929.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.76%
D&A growth less than half of AEM's 70.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 48.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 19.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 42.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 14.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 12.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-488.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.35%
Net income decline while AEM shows 51.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.45%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 21.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while AEM shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 10.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 9.87%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.