95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 25.34%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
45.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 22.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.24%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 27.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.82%
Margin decline while AEM shows 1.71% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 36.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.99%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 14.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 27.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 53.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.57%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to AEM's 22.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
46.83%
Operating income growth 50-75% of AEM's 66.91%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
33.24%
Similar operating margin growth to AEM's 33.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-115.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.02%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
130.14%
Similar tax expense growth to AEM's 169.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
22.02%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.73%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.