PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 7.74%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
75.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 45.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
62.95%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 28.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
58.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 38.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 49.97%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
85.52%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.10%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.56%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.34%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
82.05%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.87%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.05%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.73%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.