95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.79%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AEM's 57.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
11.60%
Cost growth 50-75% of AEM's 20.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
45.14%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 112.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 34.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
G&A change of 11.90% while AEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.63%
Similar total costs growth to AEM's 10.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.69%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 190.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.94%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 84.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.25%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 544.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.76%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 307.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
135.66%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 11.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
51.37%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 1109.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 739.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.23%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 81.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.37%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 382.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.63%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 278.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 381.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 372.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.34%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.14%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.