95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.28%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 14.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 18.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.67%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 11.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1803.01%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 5.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-157.58%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.58%
Total costs growth 50-75% of AEM's 12.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.49%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 9.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.36%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 16.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.21%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 2.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.08%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 20.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.88%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 4.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.44%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 391.52%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-131.15%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 413.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.00%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 21.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
33.04%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 14.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 12.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 6.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.45%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 6.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.