95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.25%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
25.66%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.06%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
G&A change of 66.32% while AEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.46%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.94%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.89%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 11.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.44%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 5.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.79%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 20.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.36%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 14.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
278.87%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 29.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
25.62%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of AEM's 35.42%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.03%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 28.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
189.28%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 11.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
21.19%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 52.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.57%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 44.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 51.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 53.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.