PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 16.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 31.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 12.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-28.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
97.44%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.01%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 48.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 27.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 77.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 51.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 97.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 69.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-81.35%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 35.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.36%
Net income decline while AEM shows 145.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 110.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.00%
EPS decline while AEM shows 148.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 148.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.