PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.22%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 12.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 61.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 43.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
G&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.21%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.22%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 108.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.90%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.55%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 3.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.35%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 50.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 28.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 77.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 57.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.73%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 98.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.72%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 132.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 128.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.11%
Tax expense growth less than half of AEM's 311.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.01%
Net income decline while AEM shows 121.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.96%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 119.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while AEM shows 121.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 121.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.