PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.36%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 8.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.70%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 10.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-25.34%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 0.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
G&A growth less than half of AEM's 4.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-256.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.98%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.06%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 5.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.29%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 18.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-20.35%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 25.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 12.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.34%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 38.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.78%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 27.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
87.31%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
905.79%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1088.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-235.01%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 10.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1057.27%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1267.31%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 1.72%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 1.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.