95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.48%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 1.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.95%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 0.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.49%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 5.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.71%
Margin decline while AEM shows 3.52% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
G&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 10.30%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.03%
Similar operating expenses growth to AEM's 16.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.07%
Total costs growth less than half of AEM's 2.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
408.21%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.94%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
96.53%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 42.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
123.83%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 42.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
125.48%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 40.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
65.78%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
124.21%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 278.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
125.89%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 276.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
123.81%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 282.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 282.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.