95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.82%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AEM's 13.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-0.43%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 7.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
27.82%
Similar gross profit growth to AEM's 34.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
16.39%
Similar margin change to AEM's 18.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.45%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 154.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.41%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 4.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.97%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.87%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 13.01%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.54%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
14.79%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of AEM's 21.51%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.80%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 11.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 87.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 64.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-23.63%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 30.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.96%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 131.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.98%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 104.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-323.90%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 103.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
37.61%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 160.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.30%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 128.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 144.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 175.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.90%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.