PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.28%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 49.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.13%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.94%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
19.52%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 588.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.91%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 31.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 60.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.49%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 36.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-86.91%
Net income decline while AEM shows 26.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.19%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 55.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
EPS decline while AEM shows 27.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 27.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.