95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.60%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.05%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 1828.56%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
27.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 8.95%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.68%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.22%
Interest expense growth less than half of AEM's 15.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.08%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.36%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 0.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.39%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3964.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 73.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
365.59%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-564.74%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 45.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
367.01%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
338.10%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.