95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 3.69%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.78%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.55%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AEM's 18.53%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
6.36%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 14.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.66%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
31.12%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
4.87%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 353.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-79.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.