95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
19.83%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.19%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
G&A growth 50-75% of AEM's 32.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.04%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 121.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.04%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-88.07%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 5.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.16%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.29%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
10.10%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.64%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 1.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 1.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.51%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 1.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.74%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.04%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.86%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.