95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.41%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 19.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-9.76%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 56.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.47%
Margin decline while AEM shows 31.50% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.76%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-41.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.99%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 9.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-1.34%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 59.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 27.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.19%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 91.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 60.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
64.26%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 21.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-5.60%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 149.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 109.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.04%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 146.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.33%
Net income decline while AEM shows 143.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 104.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
EPS decline while AEM shows 106.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 106.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 18.35%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 18.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.