95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-17.03%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-37.06%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.29%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.65%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18698.59%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.65%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5873.13%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.79%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.42%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.30%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.