PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.55%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 0.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
18.63%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.98%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 10.35%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Similar other expenses growth to AEM's 10.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 10.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.64%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 3.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of AEM's 4.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.76%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 16.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.91%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 96.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.24%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 23.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 29.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-203.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.44%
Net income decline while AEM shows 207.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.61%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 221.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.95%
EPS decline while AEM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.95%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.