95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.09%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AEM's 4.66%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
6.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 14.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.06%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 9.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.23%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while AEM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-95.20%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 7100.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 11.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.73%
Total costs growth less than half of AEM's 3.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.39%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.61%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 3.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 12.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.89%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 2.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth 50-75% of AEM's 6.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.98%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of AEM's 1.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
62.20%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of AEM's 86.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
5.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 19.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.23%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 13.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.54%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 15.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.42%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 21.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
22.63%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 15.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.93%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 18.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 20.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.33%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.