95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 11.00%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
135.58%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.89%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 17.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.39%
Margin decline while AEM shows 6.24% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-98.02%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-85.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-93.52%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 908.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.28%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.36%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
92.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 39.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
55.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 26.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
147.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 27.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
99.91%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 14.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 127.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 52.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
91.50%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 37.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of AEM's 39.01%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
188.14%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 59.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
133.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 44.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 58.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 60.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.