95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.91%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 2.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-13.92%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 6.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.28%
Margin decline while FNV shows 3.70% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.54%
Other expenses change of 42.54% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.10%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.70%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 14.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.10%
EBITDA margin decline while FNV shows 12.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.76%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 8.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.51%
Operating margin decline while FNV shows 6.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-121.15%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 136.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.99%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 19.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while FNV shows 16.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.54%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 16.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.50%
Net income decline while FNV shows 20.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of FNV's 17.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.67%
EPS decline while FNV shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.61%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.