95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 2.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 6.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of FNV's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses change of 15.84% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
83.18%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x FNV's 16.52%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
15.76%
D&A growth while FNV reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 14.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FNV's 12.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 8.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while FNV shows 6.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 136.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 19.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while FNV shows 16.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.93%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 16.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.35%
Net income decline while FNV shows 20.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.45%
Net margin decline while FNV shows 17.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while FNV shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.36%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.