95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 2.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 10.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of FNV's 7.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
G&A reduction while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 0.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-31.77%
Operating expenses reduction while FNV shows 15.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
97.44%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x FNV's 50.00%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while FNV shows 0.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 19.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FNV's 16.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 6.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Similar operating margin growth to FNV's 4.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of FNV's 4000.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Margin change of 4.14% while FNV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-81.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.36%
Net income decline while FNV shows 40.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of FNV's 37.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.00%
EPS decline while FNV shows 38.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.41%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.