PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 8.46%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
153.46%
Cost growth less than half of FNV's 881.82%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
56.56%
Positive growth while FNV shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
Similar G&A growth to FNV's 38.10%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.89%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.98%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
230.63%
D&A growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.13%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
75.24%
EBITDA growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
56.27%
Operating income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-163.83%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth while FNV reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.49%
Net income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.06%
EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.14%
Share count increase while FNV reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.13%
Diluted share increase while FNV reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.