95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 5.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while FNV shows 9.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 2.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
G&A reduction while FNV shows 13.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses change of 18.77% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while FNV shows 9.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while FNV shows 9.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while FNV shows 14.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FNV's 5.66%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 12.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while FNV shows 6.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of FNV's 107.87%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FNV's 44.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FNV's 36.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 11.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of FNV's 63.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of FNV's 54.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 60.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 60.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.