95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while FNV shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost increase while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.28%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
G&A reduction while FNV shows 52.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.13%
Operating expenses reduction while FNV shows 88.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Total costs growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.94%
Similar interest expense growth to FNV's 14.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
19.52%
D&A growth while FNV reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 4350.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.49%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FNV's 3.88%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count increase while FNV reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while FNV reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.